Michael Eisen on Twitter: "@brembs @eLife Agree that it's a drop in the bucket, but, as chemists well know, sometimes a drop in the bucket is a catalyst." / Twitter
Nature (journal) - Wikipedia
The neurobiological nature of free will
bjoern.brembs.blog » Are Nature's APCs 'outrageous' or 'very attractive'?
bjoern.brembs.blog » Are Nature's APCs 'outrageous' or 'very attractive'?
bjoern.brembs.blog » Are Nature's APCs 'outrageous' or 'very attractive'?
Björn Brembs 🇺🇦💙💛 on Twitter: "Yes, I have been critical of some of @mbeisen 's plans with @elife, but nobody, let alone someone as competent and experienced as Mike should have to
Publish or perish: how our literature serves the anti-science agenda - YouTube
![PDF] Can scientists and their institutions become their own open access publishers? | Semantic Scholar](https://d3i71xaburhd42.cloudfront.net/9d2723ec364e450f6712671f025bb52bc1382fb4/12-Table2-1.png "PDF] Can scientists and their institutions become their own open access publishers? | Semantic Scholar")
PDF] Can scientists and their institutions become their own open access publishers? | Semantic Scholar
Evolution of Cellular Networks: Doing away with scientific journals
bjoern.brembs.blog » Earning credibility in post-factual science?
PDF) Towards a Scientific Concept of Free Will as a Biological Trait: Spontaneous Actions and Decision-Making in Invertebrates
bjoern.brembs.blog » Are we inadvertently supporting the defunding of public science?
bjoern.brembs.blog » High APCs are a feature, not a bug
Can Science Set Us Free? - John Templeton Foundation
PDF) The cost of the rejection-resubmission cycle
bjoern.brembs.blog » How scientific are scientists, really?
High APCs Are a Feature, Not a Bug – The Wire Science
A replication crisis in the making: how we reward unreliable science
Björn Brembs 🇺🇦💙💛 on Twitter: "RT @mszll@datasci.social Mastodon: a move to publicly owned scholarly knowledge https://t.co/08D8I0Mgr3 Nice letter by brembs et al https://t.co/XPAwz22UjI https://t.co/qPlYGnTt2B" / Twitter
bjoern.brembs.blog » Are Nature's APCs 'outrageous' or 'very attractive'?
PDF) How Nature Magazine consistently prefers anecdote over data
A replication crisis in the making: how we reward unreliable science
![PDF] Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank | Semantic Scholar](https://d3i71xaburhd42.cloudfront.net/9e91f13b18b4012a4bd83de73e6d3ce02d2ccad5/3-Figure1-1.png "PDF] Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank | Semantic Scholar")
PDF] Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank | Semantic Scholar
Reproducibility: expect less of the scientific paper
bjoern.brembs.blog » Are Nature's APCs 'outrageous' or 'very attractive'?
bjoern.brembs.blog » New England Journal of Medicine – and you thought Nature was expensive?
